Validating customs power of attorney
Our mandate here is that whenever any person alleges that any act or omission of another is in consistent or in contravention of any part of the Constitution the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to interpret the particular Article and if it is so found, to declare that act null and void.
In this case the Attorney General sought to try the Plaintiff on a criminal charge for a criminal offence under S.179A of the Criminal Code 1960 (Act 29) at the so-called "Fast Track Court" which has been set up by the Chief Justice.
Having in Article 126 named the courts which comprises the judiciary and specified how other courts are to be created by only Parliament, it would be absurd to say that in a later Section power to create new courts would be given to the chief Justice contrary to the procedure for the creation of courts earlier specified.
But clearly what Article 13993) does not do is to give power to the Chief Justice to create a new court or as Defendant put it, a division of the High court different in species referred to as the Fast Track Court.
The examining attorney may also issue requirements concerning, for example: There are times when you may desire a combination of copyright, patent, and trademark protection for your work.
You should consult an attorney to determin what forms of intellectual property protection are best suited to your needs.
We recommend that you file your application through TEAS , and pay the fee using a credit card, existing USPTO deposit account, or electronic funds transfer (EFT). PLEASE NOTE: Fees are subject to change and should therefore be verified before submission to the USPTO. To receive a hard copy of the fee schedule you may contact the USPTO Contact Center (UCC) at 1-800-786-9199 There are other types of marks that can be registered in the USPTO, but they occur infrequently and have some different requirements for registration than the more commonly applied for trademarks and service marks.
The combined effect of Articles 1(1) and 125(1) as well as Section 62 and Form 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1960, is that criminal justice shall be administered in the name of the Republic but this provision was not complied with, in that the name of the President rather than Republic was used to summon plaintiff, - then accused, to appear before the Fast Track Court which is contrary to the provision of the said laws, and is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution as stated above.
The word "Division" in judicial parlance refers to a number of different meanings depending on the context in which it appears.